Trump’s coal and nuclear bailout helps execs and hurts the grid

In a heavy-handed directive, the Department of Energy caters to industry barons.


President Donald Trump digs coal, apparently more than he likes clean air or a healthy climate. And, as a recent document leaked by his administration indicates, he also favors coal industry profits over a free market.

Last month, Bloomberg published a draft Department of Energy directive that would employ Cold War-era laws to force utilities to purchase enough power from coal and nuclear power plants over the next two years to keep them running, thereby throwing a lifeline to the drowning industries.

This is a repeat of Trump and Energy Secretary Rick Perry’s attempt last year to make the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission give preference to coal and nuclear. FERC refused, saying that there was no evidence to suggest that any past or imminent power plant retirements would affect grid resilience. A study by Perry’s own department reached a similar conclusion. Trump’s new directive, which has been endorsed by Perry, appears to provide a way around the Energy Department’s own regulatory body.

The draft document argues that the government must step in and prop up coal and nuclear because the rash of plant retirements threatens the reliability and resilience of the electrical grid, and that, in turn, is a threat to national security, to the economy, and — ironically enough — the environment. The document provides a case study in logical contortionism, a tortured attempt to rationalize irrational meddling with markets.

President Donald J. Trump promotes the White House’s “Energy Week” at the Department of Energy last June.
Andrea Hanks/The White House

Over the last half decade, a glut of cheap natural gas and burgeoning wind and solar power-generating capacity have driven wholesale electricity prices down, nudging nuclear and coal power plants into the red and forcing dozens of them to shut down altogether. The result has been an overall decrease in the electricity sector’s greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants.

Yet according to Trump’s directive, the mass shutdown has also meant a loss of “fuel assurance,” or the ability of power plants to stockpile extra fuel on-site so that they can continue to crank out the juice if supply lines are disrupted. Coal and nuclear plants have fuel assurance. Natural gas plants, not so much. If the pipelines feeding a plant are blown up or shut down by a terrorist attack, they typically have little to no on-site backup. So an electrical grid that relies too heavily on natural gas is going to be at the mercy of the pipeline network. According to Perry’s directive, that leaves the nation vulnerable to mass blackouts.

What the directive fails to grasp, however, is that when it comes to the grid’s reliability and resilience, fuel assurance is relatively insignificant. Most outages are the result of problems within the intricate electrical transmission or distribution systems: Extreme heat can cause power lines to sag and rub against tree branches, wildfires can take out power poles, squirrels and birds commonly get caught up in substation apparatus, and sudden spikes in demand can wreak havoc on the grid. Only rarely do power-plant shutdowns result in major outages, and fuel supply is almost never the cause. In October, the independent research firm Rhodium Group found that “fuel supply issues were responsible for 0.00007 percent of lost customer electric service hours” between 2012 and 2016.

Furthermore, replacing large, centralized coal and nuclear plants with smaller, more nimble and more distributed wind, solar and natural gas plants diversifies the grid, contrary to what the directive claims, thus making it less vulnerable to catastrophic outages.

Bizarrely, the directive contends that it will result in less pollution by reducing the number of blackouts, thereby decreasing the use of dirty backup diesel generators. The logic behind this is so twisted it needs no response. That said, nuclear power generation is carbon-free, while natural gas — though cleaner than coal — is not. So keeping existing nuclear plants running could theoretically result in reduced greenhouse gas emissions (though the directive never once mentions climate, carbon or greenhouse gases). Yet this ignores the thousands of tons of excess greenhouse gases and other pollutants coal power plants will emit as a result of the directive.

Assuming the order moves beyond draft form, it likely will face a rash of legal challenges and protests. While the nuclear and coal industries like it, almost no one else does, including grid operators, utilities and even the American Petroleum Institute.

If Perry really wanted to diversify the grid and enhance reliability and resilience, he’d be putting federal dollars and energy toward developing power storage technology, both centralized and distributed, to give solar and wind a sort of fuel assurance of their own. He’d be pushing energy efficiency, rooftop solar and demand response — shifting customers’ electricity use away from times of peak demand. The draft directive seems primarily aimed at helping the coal industry, with nuclear thrown in — perhaps because the fuel-assurance argument used to back up coal also applies to nuclear. But Perry’s not really interested in any of that. He’s merely interested in creating the illusion that he and his boss are doing something to save that American icon, the coal miner. And most of all, he’s cynically using reliability and national security claims to help out Trump’s big-dollar, fossil fuel industry donors, for whom this directive seems tailor-made.

Jonathan Thompson is a contributing editor at NewTowncarShare News. He is the author of River of Lost Souls: The Science, Politics and Greed Behind the Gold King Mine Disaster.

NewTowncarShare News Classifieds
  • Wyoming Wildlife Federation - collaborates with the Executive Director and staff to ensure the effective implementation of all philanthropic activities.
  • HawkWatch International is hiring an Executive Director to lead the organization. The next leader of this growing organization must have: 1. Enthusiasm for conservation, birds...
  • Everland Mountain Retreat includes 318 mountaintop acres with a 3,200 square foot lodge and two smaller homes. Endless vistas of the Appalachian mountains, open skies,...
  • Home Resource is a non-profit community sustainability center. We work with, in, and for the community to reduce waste and build a more vibrant and...
  • Spectacular views of snowcapped Sierras. 15 miles from Kings Canyon/Sequoia Parks. 47 acres with 2 homes/75' pool/gym/patios/gardens. 1670 sq.ft. main home has 3 bdrm/1 bath....
  • Borderlands Restoration Network 501c3 is hiring a full-time Development Director. Description and job details can be found at
  • Beautiful off-the-grid passive solar near the CDT. 9.4 acres, north of Silver City. Sam, 575.388.1921
  • The City of Fort Collins is seeking an Environmental Planning Manager in the Natural Areas Department. The Department has an annual budget of approximately $13...
  • We are seeking an experienced designer to be the team lead for web development and digital media. Part creator and part planner, this person should...
  • at RCAC. See the full description at Apply at [email protected]
  • The Utah Rivers Council is looking for an energetic individual with strong communication and organizing skills. The Grassroots Organizer works to ensure our campaigns are...
  • Newly refurbished and tuned. Older model, great condition. Gasoline engine. Chains on tires. Heavy duty for mountain snow. Call cellphone and leave message or email.
  • Hiring a part-time ranch manager to live on The Nature Conservancy's Carpenter Ranch property in Hayden, CO. Responsibilities include: facility maintenance of historic ranch house,...
  • unique custom home in Sangre de Cristo Mountains of CO near La Veta Pass, 3 bed, 2 1/2 bath, private gated park, two hours from...
  • Kaniksu Land Trust, a community-supported non-profit land trust serving north Idaho and northwest Montana, is in search of a new executive director. The ideal candidate...
  • The Flathead Lakers are seeking a dynamic, self-motivated and proven leader to be our next Executive Director (ED).
  • The Blackfoot Challenge, a renowned collaborative conservation org in MT, seeks our next ED.
  • 10-day tour from Los Mochis airport, 2/nyts El Fuerte, train, 2/nyts canyon rim hotel, 5/nyts camping. 520-324-0209,
  • Earthjustice is hiring for a Staff Attorney
  • to lead an organization that funds projects in National Parks. Major gift fundraising and public lands experience critical. PD and app details @